The costs of vaping ought to be reduced for smokers in developing countries as an urgent “human rights issue”, scientific study has told a pro-tobacco conference in London.
Addressing a 300-strong audience of tobacco and vaping industry representatives, Helen Redmond, a specialist in substance use at Ny University’s Silver School of Social Work, said people in poor countries really should not be priced away from nicotine-based items that may potentially help them to to give up smoking.
Redmond compared the medicinal qualities of nicotine with cannabis and stressed “the need to get vaping to the poorest, who want it most”.
“It’s a human rights issue – being a harm reduction device, prices must fall,” she said. “Nicotine will not be a dirty drug, it will help with depression and anxiety.”
Academics in the 2018 global tobacco and nicotine forum called for further research in to the possible medical benefits associated with nicotine and a focus on the progression of innovative nicotine-based products that will provide a “smoke-free society” and lower the harmful effects of cigarettes.
Viscount Matt Ridley, an author and member of the House of Lords, joined the chorus of experts promoting vaping as a form of harm reduction, arguing that subjecting best electronic cigarettes for the same workplace restrictions as smoking may be viewed as an infringement of your individual’s human rights.
“We should treat vaping in the same manner that people treat use of mobile phones,” said Ridley. “The best practice to get people to give up [smoking] is to innovate with technology”.
Ridleytold the conference that, despite the industry’s continued give attention to promoting nicotine-based products as a kind of harm reduction, public opinion was moving from vaping as a result of media “scare stories”. He compared the industry’s plight, in particular in the united states, to that faced by “bootleggers and baptists during prohibition”.
Clive Bates, director of advocacy group Counterfactual, described the views of anti-tobacco campaigners as “hostile and focused”, accusing them of obtaining rival commercial interests with a goal of “annihilating” the business. Warning of the damage caused by “those using a vested interest in causing alarm”, he explained that while critics laboured to produce evidence to “maintain the narrative of harm”, technological advances meant the transition to vape-type products was very likely to become mandatory instead of voluntary.
You can find 1.1 billion smokers worldwide and 6 million die every year as being a direct reaction to smoking. A further 890,000 people per year die prematurely as a result of second-hand smoke, according to the World Health Organization.
Just one cigarette contains a lot more than 200 carcinogenic chemicals, along with the addictive stimulant nicotine. Scientists and academics have to date neglected to reach agreement on pros and cons of long term nicotine use.
At a plenary session, clinical psychologist Karl Fagerström called for research into the positive benefits of nicotine, which he believes can aid people suffering from Alzheimer’s and depression. He also advised wgferg the industry should move from combustible to nicotine-based products.
“No one is interested in establishing what the benefits of smoking nicotine are,” Fagerström said.
Martin Jarvis, professor of health psychology at University College London, saidthe US was moving towards prohibition-type enforcement, with all the Food and Drug Administration willing to reduce the degree of nicotine in cigarettes.
“Society doesn’t understand nicotine,” said Jarvis, “because they think it is particularly bad.”
But Jarvis said “describing nicotine as being addictive is justified”, adding that “80% of smokers wished they never started”.